Friday, March 2, 2007

What Students Have to Say About Rec

I went out and interviewed students about what they think about the SWRC. Here is what they had to say:

A graduate student and pre-physical therapy major, who wishes not to be named disagreed. "I think building a rec center is total bullshit. Spending $65 million on something we don't need when we have buildings that are falling apart is wrong. The school should focus more on academia and less on body building."

"They're forgetting that CSU is meant to be open to a wider class of people who can't afford other universities. The school is not focused on what it should be, which is education," said Nicholas Xenos, a senior political science major. "Not to mention all the money was spent by the school on the campaign. They're giving away shirts that support the rec center, but no one is asking questions."

Alan Schaefer, a senior marketing major, said that “Long Beach State needs a central location to work out and keep students on campus. Unlike places to go nearby, it will put students first and will cost less money.” “People that voted no did it because they didn’t know all the facts or they just don’t care about the campus,” said Schaefer.

“There is no reason why we shouldn’t have one,” said Derek Franklin, a sophomore business management major, “it seems like a good idea.” Franklin made his decision after hearing a presentation by the University Students Union Board of Trustees Chair, Amanda Stone on Monday night.

Nicholas Xenos, a senior political science major added, “They’re forgetting that CSU is meant to be open to a wider class of people who can’t afford other universities. The school is not focused on what it should be which is education.” “Not to mention all the money was spent by the school on the campaign. They’re giving away shirts that support the rec center but no one is asking questions.”

"I voted yes,” said senior recreation major Nate Bernal after leaving a voting station near the SSPA building. “I think it will pass because it’s a necessity. We’re one of the only schools around that doesn’t have one.”

Thursday, March 1, 2007

Students Say "Yes" to Rec Center

After the voting this past week, students voted "yes" for the Student Recreation and Wellness Center. Accodring to an article in the Daily 49er, 2,918 students came out to "talk about rec." Of these students, 74.7 percent (2,181) voted yes and 25.2 percent (737) voted no.

Monday, February 26, 2007

Story Ideas

Three ideas for stories include:

1. Follow up on the Library article, and see how much the closure is truly affecting students and how long LINK+ is really taking now that more people are using it.

2. Do another follow up on the construction of the library and find out what happened with construction and how far behind and if they are going over budget.

3. Do a piece about the result of the vote for the Student Rec and Wellness Center, and get student and faculty reactions to it. Then find out how plans will change whether or not it is going to happen.

Library



The CSULB Library is closing off floors two and three of the in mid-March - that includes mid-terms and finals.

Not many people were available for comment in the Library, and when asked about the closures librarians and other library employees all directed to the Library Dean - who was unavailable.

They directed me to look into the LINK+ system, because that is how students are going to be getting books. An interesting fact is throught the LINK+ system, CSULB loans out more books through the system and Inter Library Loan (ILLiad) than they borrow. Not only is this affecting students and faculty at CSULB, but it is also affecting students and faculty at the other libraries in the network.

But a solution may be on the way... according to an e-mail to library personell, "The uncertainty regarding access to 2nd and 3rdfloor stacks after March 14 was resolved this a.m. We will be able to page from those collections...as (of course) we'd originally intended."


This picture was taken by me on the third floor of the library.